|
I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words.
We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness
is tiresome; variety is pleasing. I have a correspondent whose letters are always
a refreshment to me, there is such a breezy unfettered originality about his
orthography. He always spells Kow with a large K. Now that is just as good as
to spell it with a small one. It is better. It gives the imagination a broader
field, a wider scope. It suggests to the mind a grand, vague, impressive new
kind of a cow.
- speech at a spelling match, Hartford, Connecticut, May 12, 1875. Reported
in the Hartford Courant, May 13, 1875
Why, there isn't a man who doesn't have to throw out about fifteen hundred
words a day when he writes his letters because he can't spell them! It's like
trying to do a St. Vitus dance with wooden legs.
- The Alphabet and Simplified Spelling speech, December 9, 1907
...simplified spelling is all right, but, like chastity, you can carry it too
far.
- The Alphabet and Simplified Spelling speech, December 9, 1907
I have had an aversion to good spelling for sixty years and more, merely for
the reason that when I was a boy there was not a thing I could do creditably
except spell according to the book. It was a poor and mean distinction and I
early learned to disenjoy it. I suppose that this is because the ability to
spell correctly is a talent, not an acquirement. There is some dignity about
an acquirement, because it is a product of your own labor. It is wages earned,
whereas to be able to do a thing merely by the grace of God and not by your
own effort transfers the distinction to our heavenly home--where possibly it
is a matter of pride and satisfaction but it leaves you naked and bankrupt.
- Mark Twain's Autobiography
I never had any large respect for good spelling. That is my feeling yet. Before
the spelling-book came with its arbitrary forms, men unconsciously revealed
shades of their characters and also added enlightening shades of expression
to what they wrote by their spelling, and so it is possible that the spelling-book
has been a doubtful benevolence to us.
- Mark Twain's Autobiography
...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three
hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the
whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred,
borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the
spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft
and preserving the memory of the revered crime.
- Mark Twain's Autobiography
The Atlanta Constitution, April 22, 1906,
p. E3
MARK TWAIN ON SPELLING REFORM. Mark Twain does not believe that the project of the Carnegie spelling reformers will succeed. "It won't happen," he says, "and I am sorry as a dog. For I do love revolutions and violence." He believes, however, that the reform could be made effective if it were done "by a sudden and comprehensive rush"; but he doubts if the effort at a slow and gradual change is worth while. "It is," he says, "the sudden changes in principles, morals, religious, fashions, and tastes that have the best chance of winning in our day. Suppose all the newspapers and periodicals should suddenly adopt a Carnegian system of phonetic spelling--what would happen? We all know quite well what would happen. To begin with, the nation would be in a rage; it would break into a storm of scoffs, jeers, sarcasms, cursings, vituperations, and keep it up for months--but it would have to read the papers; it couldn't help itself. By and by, and gradually, the offensive phonetics would lose something of their strange and uncanny look; after another by and by they would lose all of it, and begin to look rather natural and pleasant; after a couple of years of this, the nation would think them handsome, sane, and expressive, and would prefer them to any other breed of spelling." |
Quotations | Newspaper Articles | Special Features | Links | Search